Data remains at source
A federated design allows approved analysis across local nodes while maintaining the source institution’s stewardship of individual records.
HERITAGE ALLIANCE · DATA & KNOWLEDGE
Explore published catalogue information and a reference approach to responsible, federated health data research. Dataset access is always separate from catalogue visibility.
Adapted from the EpiScientia IHDP reference design. The following describes intended architecture and principles; operational Heritage integrations remain to be verified.
A federated design allows approved analysis across local nodes while maintaining the source institution’s stewardship of individual records.
OMOP CDM and controlled vocabularies provide a shared structure and meaning for harmonised research data.
Documented extract, transform and load processes can map local source systems into a common research structure.
Minimise data movement and consider consent, permissions, disclosure risk and applicable law throughout the design.
Illustrative local nodes connect through a central query-processing hub. Numbered labels are placeholders, not evidence of live country integrations.
Local Data Nodes
NPHI Node
NPHI Node
NPHI Node
NPHI Node
NPHI Node
OMOP CDM · Federated Analytics · No Patient Data Storage
Dashboards & Reports
Publications & Studies
Briefs & Guidance
The source design brings six complementary capabilities together.
Institutional nodes support locally governed participation in approved collaborative analysis.
Common structures and concept mappings make data easier to interpret consistently.
Repeatable transformations document how source data becomes research-ready.
Research tools can support descriptive analysis, modelling and decision support.
Agreements, review processes and data-owner decisions guide acceptable use.
Metadata describes available resources without granting access to the underlying data.
These are source-system categories described by the reference design, not a list of confirmed Heritage connections.
Clinical records from compatible local health systems.
Structured records supporting disease-specific research.
Information collected for public health programmes.
Survey indicators and documented population estimates.
Laboratory results and surveillance information.
Data collected under the permissions of an outbreak investigation.
Responsible use requires both technical safeguards and institutional decisions.
Assess identifiability and disclosure risks before releasing outputs.
Review GDPR and relevant national law where they apply; no compliance certification is implied.
Confirm the responsible institution, required ethical approvals and data-owner permission for each project.